Archive for Women’s Issues

Lilith 2010 Announces Additions to Lineup

The 2010 Lilith Tour has announced additions to the summer touring festival.

Heart
Norah Jones
Cat Power
Sia
Gossip
La Roux
Ceci Bastida
Erin McCarley
Frazey Ford
Julia Othmer
Kate Nash
Lights
Missy Higgins
Lissie
Marina & The Diamonds
Pricilla Renea
Rosie Thomas
Toby Lightman
Melissa McClelland
Beth Orton
Elizaveta

15 additional cities have been revealed, with more to come in the next few weeks: Edmonton, San Diego, Phoenix, Salt Lake City, St. Louis, Indianapolis, Detroit, Hartford, Raleigh, Charlotte, Nashville, West Palm Beach, Tampa, Houston and Austin.

One Woman Will Pedal 12,000 Miles to Promote HIV Awareness and Prevention

In the podcast below, Jamila K. Gaskins chats about Project 1 – a documentary of one woman cycling 12,000 miles to create a national HIV prevention ride. The ride is also designed to foster community and empower women to take control of their life and body.

http://sisterstalk.net/project1.mp3

From Jamila’s web site:

In 1992, women accounted for an estimated 14% of adults and adolescents living with AIDS in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. By the end of 2005, this proportion had grown to 23%. Currently women account for 26% of the new HIV diagnoses (Center for Disease Control and Prevention June 2007). Woman focused HIV prevention strategies and policies must be created. Women and girls must be empowered to take control of their bodies and make choices that are in line with a healthy way of life.

In the fight against HIV, women and girls have been overlooked. Prevention is not only about safe sex. It includes the factors that influence relationships and sexual behavior from low self-worth to sexual assault to domestic violence to poverty. Project 1 gives the issue a voice and face with whom other women and girls can identify, provides concrete ways to become active in our own rescue and creates a community of people working for prevention reaching beyond cultural and age boundaries with the understanding that HIV/AIDS affects women from all strata of society.

American Idol Winner Jordin Sparks to Host America’s Biggest Sleepover

She’s not queer, but I love Jordin – even though I never watched a single episode of American Idol.

America’s Biggest Sleepover is an event created to bring together teen girls from across the country. The event is hosted by American Idol winner Jordin Sparks. The nationwide online event will be hosted on November 7 on beinggirl.com – a Tampax and Always affiliated site.

America’s Biggest Sleepover will feature an exclusive performance from Jordin Sparks, a Q&A with Jordin from beinggirl.com members and sleepover party tips including recipes, fun games and hairstyles.

For every girl who signs up to participate on beinggirl.com, Always will donate $1 (up to $25,000 total) to the Protecting Futures program, which helps girls in developing regions stay in school.

Ms Magazine: You Didn’t Want Us Then, We Don’t Want You Now

I just received a promotional email from Jessica Stites, Associate Editor of Ms. Magazine. I replied with the following:

I am no longer interested in receiving information about Ms. Magazine. For years, it was my opinion that your magazine has catered to a white female audience and has largely ignored women of color and the issues related to us. I have kept an eye on your work for the past 6 months and that opinion has not changed.

It seems only since the recession has your magazine cared to reach out to women of color, mostly because your magazine – and many others – are suffering financially. When you didn’t need money or attention from women of color, you ignored us. Now that you need money wherever you can find it, you’re suddenly making an attempt (a pathetic one, in my opinion) to reach across those race borders.

You didn’t want us back then, we don’t want you now.

Regards,
Genia

If anyone knows of a feminist or womanist magazine that has always made a sincere effort to be inclusive, let me know. I will gladly support that publication. Otherwise, the Ms. Magazine and Bitch magazines of the world can kiss my BLACK ass.

Even Bitch Magazine Hates Hairy Chochas

In keeping with the theme for SistersTalk Radio’s anniversary show Monday night, I’m looking for interesting sex articles to discuss. I found a couple of amusing articles (here and here). Some of you might find it odd that Bitch (a self-proclaimed feminist magazine rag) refused to run the following advertisement because (supposedly, since we don’t know for sure) it’s displaying a hairy bush:

Personally, for me, a hairy bush is a dealbreaker. But I don’t claim I’m a feminist magazine published to empower all women, so I can say that.

In my opinion, it’s not the hairy bush that bothers the folks over at Bitch. It’s the hairy bush peeking out of a pair of pink panties that bothers them. If that hairy bush was visible through the opening of a pair of plaid boxers, we wouldn’t be having this discussion. True hairy feminists don’t wear pink undies, correct?

Of course I’m joking.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. The Bitch rag can do whatever it wants and reserves the right to refuse any advertisement. But, does anyone else find it odd that a feminist magazine that’s struggling to pay its bills wouldn’t run an ad like this one? It seems pretty harmless to me, but then again, I’m not one of those kinds of feminists so I wouldn’t understand what “harmless” means to them.

And yep, I used the qualifier “those kinds” to describe those kinds of feminists. We’ll be discussing this more on SistersTalk Radio Monday night. Join us!

Update:
One of my Twitter followers said “Though, rather than the hair it may have been the male stereotype on the front of the panties that did it.”

Since we don’t know for sure, let’s assume (hypothetically, of course) that the reason Bitch refused to run the ad is because it supposedly objectifies women. Pfft! Call me an objectifier then because I love pretty pink vaginas – and a whole lot of sex positive lesbians would agree with me.

Dear Feminists: Which Woman Will You Side With? The Lesbian or the Ex Lesbian?

Update: I failed to mention that the biological mom became a born again Christian and claims she is no longer a lesbian. That information is mentioned in the article on the men’s web site and in the article where I grabbed the summary.
—————————–

An interesting new column on a men’s web site caught my attention today: The Rise of Lesbian Custody Battles. The author is comparing bitter lesbian mothers to straight mothers who keep their children from a former partner and co-parent just because they’re angry the relationship has ended:

Mothers are often able to convince courts to allow them to drive decent, loving fathers out of their children’s lives by employing anti-father/pro-mother stereotypes and by portraying dads as abusive or unfit. But there are no abusive males or bad dads in lesbian custody battles. Nevertheless, when two lesbians agree to have a child together and the relationship goes sour, the lesbian biological mom often does the exact same thing to her ex as heterosexual mothers do.

In case you don’t recall this case, here’s a summary:

In a case that has attracted national attention because it highlights the starkly different treatment lesbian and gay parents experience across state lines, Lambda Legal, ACLU of Virginia and Equality Virginia appealed a case in Virginia on behalf of a woman who is being denied visitation with her child despite a clear court order from Vermont.

Janet Miller-Jenkins is seeking to enforce a court order saying she must have regular visitation with the two-year-old daughter she and her former partner, Lisa Miller-Jenkins, had when the two women were joined in a Vermont civil union. After the women ended their relationship, Lisa moved to Virginia with the women’s daughter, and she asked a Vermont court to dissolve the couple’s civil union and sort out custody of the child. When that Vermont court ordered visitation for Janet, Lisa filed a new lawsuit in Virginia court, successfully using that state’s antigay marriage law to have herself declared the child’s sole legal parent. The conflicting court orders — one from Vermont ordering regular visitation for Janet, and the other from Virginia naming Lisa the sole parent — led to the appeal, which asks a state court to overturn the Virginia ruling.

The appeal cites the federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act and Virginia’s Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. In this case, both laws make it clear that the Vermont court alone has jurisdiction in the matter and cannot be interfered with — and the federal kidnapping law requires that the Vermont order be enforced in Virginia.

My exhusband and I have joint legal custody of our children; I have primary placement. That ruling came, not because I employed any anti-male or anti-father tactics, but because I was the primary caregiver for years while my exhusband spent 3/4 of the year traveling the world on a Navy ship.

I’m annoyed by mothers – any mother – who takes a child away from a co-parent out of spite. When you decide to co-parent a child with someone you love, you have to keep in mind that one day you might not love that person anymore. Regardless, even if you don’t love that person, your child still does.

I wonder how all those self-proclaimed feminists will address a biological mother taking a child from a lesbian co-parent out of spite. If they truly support the rights of all women, which woman will they side with in this case?

Queen Latifah Hangs Out at Lesbian Bar Adding Fuel to Lesbian Rumor

Rumor has it that Queen Latifah is a lesbian. Let me tell ya, no one wants that rumor to be true more than I do. I think she’s gorgeous and sometimes people tell me I look like her!

Recently, Queen Latifah was seen hanging out a lesbian bar in New York. I guess that makes her behavior suspect because straight girls never hang out at lesbian bars . . . right? I’ll have to remind my straight female friends to stop meeting me at our local gay bar unless they want the entire town to assume they’re lesbos.

Prehaps the fact that Queen Latifah isn’t married to a man, is rarely seen photographed with a man and is never linked romantically to a man and has no children (that we know of) makes her sexuality questionable. But before we assume that any single woman over the age of 35 who has never been in a heterosexual marriage is a lesbian, I want to call your attention to Marcia Cross.

Cross is an actress from Desperate Housewives and she’s also former nutcase Kimberly of Melrose Place. In 2005, rumors circulated that Cross was a lesbian. She was in her 40s, single, never married and childless. In June 2006, Cross married businessman Tom Mahoney. What I find interesting (and suspect) about Cross is that she was furious that veteran newswoman Barbara Walters questioned her about her sexual oriention in front of her parents. Seriously? A 40+ year old woman is still concerned about what her parents think of her?

I’m sure straight feminist women are annoyed (and rightfully so) by anyone who assumes a woman is a lesbian just because she hits a certain age, she’s childless and has never been married. I’m sure there are lots and lots and lots of unmarried heterosexual women over the age of 40, right? Queen Latifah, who will be 40 on March 18, 2010, better hurry up and find a man – or she’ll never live down those lesbian rumors.

4 Wisconsin Women Charged in Lover’s Revenge

Stories like these make me love being a Wisconsin resident. Ya never run out of people to laugh at – and this story makes me laugh a lot.

Warning to cheating men: If you live in a small town, don’t cheat on your spouse with other locals. They’ll find out, ya dumbass.

Warning to psycho, angry, jilted women: Kidnapping someone is against the law, regardless of the reason.

Read the story here.

Gays Disappointed Twice Today: Prop 8 and SCOTUS

On Friday, May 15, a nasty Prop 8 rumor made its way through Twitter. The rumor stated that California had overturned Prop 8. Excited Tweeters (like myself) quickly retweeted this information and linked to an old gay marriage article (without checkin’ the date first) as proof that Prop 8 had been overturned. Just as quickly as the rumor started, it died; we all learned that the California Supreme Court wouldn’t announce a decision on Prop 8 until May 26.

And so it happened. Today the gay community learned that California’s high court has upheld the gay marriage ban passed in November 2008:

“In summary, we conclude that Proposition 8 constitutes a permissible constitutional amendment (rather than an impermissible constitutional revision), does not violate the separation of powers doctrine, and is not invalid under the ‘inalienable rights’ theory proffered by the Attorney General. We further conclude that Proposition 8 does not apply retroactively and therefore that the marriages of same-sex couples performed prior to the effective date of Proposition 8 remain valid. Having determined that none of the constitutional challenges to the adoption of Proposition 8 have merit, we observe that if there is to be a change to the state constitutional rule embodied in that measure, it must ‘find its expression at the ballot box.’”

Twitter was buzzin’ with the news and live citizen-coverage of a Prop 8 protest in San Francisco had Tweeters glued to their computer monitors. I’m guessing the next move will be an attempt to get this issue back on the ballot for California voters to re-evaluate. Let’s hope the gay community’s leaders (both large and small) do a better job of training gay activists to pound the pavement and make face-to-face contact with voters (all voters, not just gay white voters) who will eventually support full equality for the LGBTQ community.

If it makes anyone feel better (I doubt it!) Governor Terminator said he would abide by the state high court’s ruling, but believes gay marriage will eventually be approved. Does that mean Terminator will throw California queers a bone before he leaves office?

I asked my Twitter followers if they thought it was a coincidence that President Obama announced his SCOTUS nominee within hours of the California Supreme court annoucing its decision on Prop 8. None of my respondents thought it was a coincidence.

Obama’s SCOTUS nominee, Hispanic female Sonia Sotomayor, is not the openly gay woman the gay community was hoping for. But let’s not fret just yet. There was no husband or children mentioned in any of the White House press releases detailing Sotomayor’s personal and professional life. Perhaps there’s still hope that the gay community will have an ally in the nation’s high court.

Sotomayor is replacing justice David Souter (rumored to be a closet case) who, before his time on the Supreme Court, had supported legislation that banned gay adoption. After Souter stepped into his SCOTUS shoes, he became an advocate for gay rights.

‘Women’s Movement’ eWomen.net Advertises on Anti-Gay Web Site

While spying on the anti-gay organization AFA, I saw the following ad for eWomen.net. This organization looks like the newest breed of Stepford Wives – complete with a few colored gals gracing their web site’s main page.

eWomen.net describes their movement as America’s new explosive women’s movement. It looks more like a push to convince women to be cowards who don’t stand up for themselves. The Sin of Being Offended section reads:

From a spiritual perspective, the truth of the matter is that as believers we have no right to take offense at what others do or say to us. When someone tells me of the damaging words or actions of another, I like to encourage them with the life of Christ. He is, after all, our model. If you search scripture you will find that Christ never took offense for what others did to him. He was only angry at others’ actions when they offended the Father. His focus (just like ours should be) was on God and his instruction. Christ did not focus on the violence or angry words that were cast upon him. Instead he prayed for those who attacked him. If we, as believers, can turn our focus upward instead of inward, we can be free from the slings and arrows of mean people. There is a unique kind of freedom that comes with deciding not to allow the hurtful words and mean actions of others to control us.

Oh yeah, that’s the first step in an extensive course on “How to Beat Your Wife and Get Away With It.” Just hand her the article that tells her being offended is a sin and you can beat her ass all day long everyday without one word of protest.

I guess the newest wave of feminism(?) doesn’t care much for homosexuals since its organizers are advertising on a religious web site that’s obsessed with promoting hateful rhetoric about homosexuals. I’m kinda surprised Carrie Prejean isn’t their spokeswoman.

Sidenote: Someone ought to tell Prejean that vanity is a sin. Her surgically enhanced tits won’t impress Jesus.